I
am often struck by the differences in value systems between the U.S. and the
other countries I travel in. Because we can understand each other, live in
similar circumstances, have more or less familiar political, organizational,
and family systems, we assume we also share a similar value system. Some of
these values may be issues such as honesty, loyalty, fidelity, ambition, money
(earning it and spending it), power, pride, revenge, and respect for human and
animal life.
For
instance, giving and receiving bribes is the accepted way of conducting
business in many countries. Loyalty to one’s company is a higher virtue in
Japan than here. Infidelity in marriage is accepted in many Latin countries (as
long as it’s the man who strays). Revenge is expected if you’re a Sicilian.
I
came across a value that I had assumed was universal. It wasn’t. During a
speaking engagement to a group of 130 female executive secretaries in Portugal,
I encountered women had come from all over the world for a three-day seminar.
English was the common language, and much was gained by their talking to one
another and comparing jobs, bosses, and social and political environments.
In
fact, one woman worked for a boss in Italy and another worked for the same man
when he traveled to his Belgium office. In Belgium he was call “Sir,” was
formal and non-interactive. In Italy he was known by his first name and joked
and socialized with his staff. This man obviously was fitting into the culture
of his particular work group and was a good example of how the expected norms
of conduct should influence behavior.
The
speakers were excellent and all emphasized upward mobility, job opportunities,
and strategies for getting ahead. The participants were surprisingly
non-responsive. I noticed that they had no questions at the end of the talks
and looked glazed a good deal of the time.
I
decided to take a survey and found the problem. A large majority of the
attendees had been in the same job for over fifteen years and only a small
minority had any interest in moving out of their secretarial positions into
more managerial or administrative jobs. The organizers expressed not only their
surprise, but also their upset at the lack of ambition from the women there.
Their
companies had sent these women for three days to a lovely resort by the ocean
as a reward for loyalty and good work. If they achieved some personal growth,
learned to communicate better, improved their telephone skills, broadened their
general knowledge, learned of new computer technologies, and enjoyed the
sunshine—that was good enough. The seminar organizers, on the other hand, had
seen their purpose as getting the women out of their secretarial roles into
positions of greater responsibility, authority, and power.
I
was fortunate to be the closing speaker and could use the information from my
survey. I changed my talk from “Onward and Upward” to “Happy at Work.” In other
words, I extolled the virtues of predictability and security and gave
permission to not “go anywhere” and to
not feel guilty about it.
In
our culture, ambition is almost universally seen as positive, whereas words
such as “stuck” and “plateaued” have negative connotations. We don’t have a term
in our language defining lack of ambition as a happy state of standing still,
as a satisfactory place to remain for an indefinite period of time. I have
often heard people ask questions such as: “Where will you be in five or ten
years?” As if one should expect to be in a more satisfactory place; the
assumption being that wherever you are now is not going to be good enough.
We
need to re-evaluate our unexamined priorities. “Up” may not be the only way to
go. There is a recent trend of professional women leaving their jobs in order to
raise children and find satisfaction as stay-at-home moms.
I
have caught myself trying to help people move into more lucrative or more
fulfilling work, never wondering whether indeed more is better. I had not
considered the security of stability, the pleasure of staying in a position one
knows and does well, nor the validity of the choice to prioritize other aspects
of our lives above professional success. We will find satisfaction only when we
give ourselves permission to follow our own individual paths rather than
running wherever the herd is headed.
Copyright © 2013. Natasha
Josefowitz. All rights reserved.
What an insight you made. It is difficult to realize our own expectations and not project them on others. Thanks for the tip! How did the women respond to your closing remarks? More enthusiastically?
ReplyDelete